
Currently serving · Supreme Court of the United States
Amy Coney Barrett
Currently serving
Associate Justice · Supreme Court of the United States · 2020–present · Appointed by Donald Trump
Amy Coney Barrett serves as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (2020–present) was appointed by Donald Trump. The page below collects sourced biographical facts, the appointment record, and provenance for Barrett.
FJC ID: 3979311
Key facts
- Full name
- Amy Coney Barrett
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Role
- Associate Justice
- Status
- Currently serving
- Seat
- SCT0714
- Appointed by
- Donald Trump
- Appointment
- Senate-confirmed
- Confirmed
- 2020-10-26
- Supreme Court service
- 2020–present
- Took seat
- 2020
- Born
- —
- Died
- —
- Dataset version
- 1.20260616
Appointment & service record
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States · 2020–present
- Seat
- SCT0714
- Appointing president
- Donald Trump
- Appointment
- Senate-confirmed
- Confirmed
- October 26, 2020
Seat, appointing president, appointment type, confirmation date, and service dates are drawn from the Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory and the Supreme Court's own members roster.[1][2][3]
Sources
- [1]https://www.fjc.gov/node/3979311fjc · retrieved 2026-06-16
- [2]https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/members_text.aspxsupremecourt.gov · retrieved 2026-06-16
- [3]https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/biographical-directory-article-iii-federal-judges-exportfjc-directory · retrieved 2026-06-16
Biographical narrative
888 words · sourced from the Wikipedia REST extract
Amy Coney Barrett has served as an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court since October 2020, following a distinguished career in academia and appellate litigation. Born in 1972, she rose through the ranks of the federal judiciary to become the fifth woman ever appointed to the nation’s highest court. Her tenure on the bench reflects a consistent emphasis on textualism and originalism, principles that have guided her scholarship, teaching, and judicial opinions.
Early life and legal career
Barrett entered the world in 1972 as Amy Vivian Coney. She pursued higher education at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee, where she earned a Bachelor of Arts degree with honors in English literature while also minoring in French. Her academic excellence was recognized through membership in Omicron Delta Kappa and Phi Beta Kappa, and she received distinction as the most outstanding graduate of her department.
Following her undergraduate studies, Barrett attended Notre Dame Law School on a full-tuition scholarship. She served as executive editor of the law review during her time there and graduated summa cum laude in 1997, ranking first in her class. Immediately after law school, she entered judicial clerkships that would shape her future career: first with Judge Laurence Silberman of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (1997‑1998), then with Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court (1998‑1999). These experiences provided foundational exposure to appellate and constitutional law.
From 1999 to 2002, Barrett practiced in Washington, D.C., at Miller Cassidy Larroca & Lewin, a boutique litigation firm that later merged with Baker Botts. During her tenure there she contributed research and briefing support for the firm’s representation of George W. Bush in the Bush v. Gore case stemming from the 2000 presidential election.
Barrett transitioned to academia in 2001 as a visiting associate professor and John M. Olin Fellow at George Washington University Law School. The following year she joined the faculty of Notre Dame Law School, her alma mater, where she taught courses on federal courts, evidence, constitutional law, and statutory interpretation. She became a full professor in 2010 and held the Diane and M.O. Miller II Research Chair of Law from 2014 to 2017. Her scholarship focused on constitutional theory, originalism, statutory construction, and the doctrine of stare decisis, with articles appearing in several prominent law reviews.
In addition to her teaching responsibilities, Barrett served as a visiting professor at the University of Virginia School of Law in 2007. She also contributed to legal education through participation in the Blackstone Legal Fellowship program (2011‑2016), which aimed to expose law students to constitutional issues from a particular perspective. In 2010, Chief Justice John Roberts appointed her to the Advisory Committee for the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Supreme Court tenure
Barrett’s ascent to the federal appellate bench began in May 2017 when President Donald J. Trump nominated her to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, a seat vacated by Judge John Daniel Tinder upon taking senior status. The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on September 6, 2017, and she was confirmed by the full Senate later that year. She served on the Seventh Circuit until her elevation to the Supreme Court in 2020.
The vacancy created by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death prompted President Trump to nominate Barrett on September 26, 2020. The nomination attracted significant attention because it occurred less than a month before the 2020 presidential election, a timing that mirrored the controversy surrounding Senatorial actions during the 2016 election cycle. Despite the political debate, the United States Senate confirmed Barrett by a vote of 52–48 on October 26, 2020; all Democrats and one Republican opposed her confirmation.
Barrett assumed office as an associate justice on the Supreme Court on October 27, 2020, occupying seat SCT0714. She is the fifth woman to serve on the court, joining a small but growing group of female justices who have shaped U.S. jurisprudence over the past decades.
Jurisprudence and legacy
Barrett’s judicial philosophy has been characterized by a commitment to textualism in statutory interpretation and originalism in constitutional analysis. These principles are evident in her scholarly writings and have guided her approach to cases on the bench. While she is generally regarded as part of the court’s conservative bloc, observers note that she has occasionally served as a swing vote in contentious decisions, indicating a willingness to consider individual case merits beyond ideological alignment.
Her reputation as a protégé of Justice Antonin Scalia stems from their shared emphasis on textualist and originalist methods. This intellectual lineage informs her contributions to the court’s deliberations and opinions. In addition to her judicial work, Barrett has continued to engage in legal scholarship; she published a book titled *Listening to the Law* in September 2025, which reflects on the relationship between law and its interpretation.
Throughout her career, Barrett has maintained a focus on the integrity of legal texts and the historical context of constitutional provisions. Her tenure on the Supreme Court is expected to influence the development of U.S. law for years to come, particularly in areas where statutory language and constitutional meaning intersect. As she continues to serve, her decisions will be examined by scholars, practitioners, and the public alike, contributing to the ongoing dialogue about the role of judicial interpretation in American society.
Sources & provenance
Every quantitative or attributable claim above carries a per-section [N] marker that resolves to the corresponding URL below. Each entry records the upstream provider, the canonical URL, and the timestamp at which the underlying source was retrieved.
Key facts
- https://www.fjc.gov/node/3979311fjc · retrieved 2026-06-16
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/members_text.aspxsupremecourt.gov · retrieved 2026-06-16
- https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/biographical-directory-article-iii-federal-judges-exportfjc-directory · retrieved 2026-06-16
Biographical narrative
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_BarrettWikipedia · retrieved 2026-06-16
Explore the federal judiciary
Fewer than 120 people have served on the Supreme Court of the United States in its history. Browse the full roster of current and former justices, or explore how the appointed federal judiciary fits into the federal government.