Skip to main content
Portrait of David James Porter, circuit judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons · cc-by-sa-4.0

Currently serving · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

David James Porter

Currently serving

Circuit Judge · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018–present · Appointed by Donald Trump

David James Porter serves as a circuit judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (2018–present). Porter was appointed by Donald Trump.

Key facts

Full name
David James Porter
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Office
Circuit Judge (U.S. Court of Appeals)
Status
Active circuit judge
Duty status
Active
Appointment
Senate-confirmed
FJC seat
CA31203
Tenure
2018–present
Confirmed
2018-10-11
Born
1966
Died
First year on the bench
2018
Dataset version
1.20260705

Appointment & service record

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018–present

    Seat
    CA31203
    Appointment
    Senate-confirmed
    Appointing president
    Donald Trump
    Confirmed
    2018-10-11
    Commissioned
    2018-10-15
    Senior status

Court, FJC seat, appointment type (Senate-confirmed or recess), appointing president, confirmation and commission dates, and senior-status date are drawn from the Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory and Wikidata.[1][2][3]

Sources

  1. [1]https://www.fjc.gov/node/5373046fjc · retrieved 2026-07-05
  2. [2]https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/biographical-directory-article-iii-federal-judges-exportfjc-directory · retrieved 2026-07-05
  3. [3]https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q55609117Wikidata · retrieved 2026-07-05

Biographical narrative

1,006 words · sourced from the Wikipedia REST extract

David James Porter is a United States circuit judge serving on the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Appointed by President Donald J. Trump in 2018, he has been an active member of the federal appellate bench since receiving his commission that October. Prior to his judicial service, Porter built a career as a litigator and clerk, and he has maintained long‑standing involvement with the Federalist Society.

David James Porter was born on March 8, 1966, in Kittanning, Pennsylvania. He pursued undergraduate studies first at Millersville University of Pennsylvania before completing a Bachelor of Arts degree at Grove City College in 1988. Continuing his education in law, Porter earned a Juris Doctor from the George Mason University School of Law—now known as the Antonin Scalia Law School—in 1992. While at George Mason, he contributed to the scholarly community as an articles editor for the institution’s law review.

Following graduation, Porter entered the federal judiciary as a law clerk to Judge D. Brooks Smith of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, serving in that capacity from 1992 until 1994. The clerkship provided him with firsthand experience in federal trial proceedings and judicial decision‑making.

After completing his clerkship, Porter joined the Pittsburgh firm Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney. At the firm he practiced across several substantive areas, including regulatory law, constitutional law, and commercial litigation. This broad exposure to complex legal issues informed his later work on the appellate bench.

Porter’s professional affiliations include a long‑standing relationship with the Federalist Society, a national organization of lawyers and scholars dedicated to discussing and promoting ideas about the Constitution and the rule of law. He was first a member from 1989 to 1992, rejoined in 1995, and subsequently served as president of its Pittsburgh chapter. His involvement reflects an ongoing engagement with legal discourse outside of his formal judicial duties.

In 2014 Porter’s name surfaced in discussions about potential federal judicial nominations from Pennsylvania. At that time a bipartisan arrangement—traditionally allocating three nominees from the party of one senator to one nominee from the opposite party—was being negotiated between Senators Bob Casey (Democrat) and Pat Toomey (Republican). Porter was considered for a district‑court vacancy in the Western District of Pennsylvania, but opposition from progressive groups over his positions on issues such as abortion, same‑sex marriage, and gun regulation led to his removal from that particular package.

Federal appellate service

President Donald J. Trump announced his intent to nominate Porter to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on April 10, 2018. The nomination was intended to fill the seat vacated by Judge D. Michael Fisher, who had assumed senior status on February 1, 2017. Senator Bob Casey Jr. expressed immediate opposition to the nomination, while Senator Pat Toomey voiced support.

Porter’s formal nomination was transmitted to the Senate on April 12, 2018. The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on his qualifications on June 6, 2018. Following deliberations, the committee reported the nomination favorably by an 11–10 vote on July 19, 2018. The full United States Senate confirmed Porter on October 11, 2018, with a vote of 50–45. He received his judicial commission four days later, on October 15, 2018, and has served as an active circuit judge on the Third Circuit ever since.

As a member of the Third Circuit, Judge Porter participates in panels that review appeals from federal district courts within the circuit’s jurisdiction, which includes Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and the Virgin Islands. His role involves interpreting statutes, applying constitutional principles, and ensuring uniformity of federal law across the circuit. The position also entails authoring opinions, joining majority or dissenting judgments, and contributing to the development of precedent that may be reviewed by the Supreme Court.

Jurisprudence and legacy

Judge Porter’s jurisprudential contributions are reflected in the opinions he has authored since joining the Third Circuit. A notable decision issued in May 2020 involved a case concerning the University of the Sciences. Writing for a unanimous three‑judge panel, Porter concluded that the university had violated its contractual obligations by expelling a student accused of sexual assault without providing a live hearing or an opportunity to cross‑examine witnesses. The opinion emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and due process in institutional disciplinary actions, underscoring the court’s willingness to enforce contractual guarantees even within academic settings.

Porter’s background in regulatory and constitutional law, cultivated during his years at Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney, informs his analytical approach on the bench. While specific voting patterns across a broad range of cases are not detailed here, his participation in decisions that protect procedural rights suggests an attentiveness to the application of established legal standards.

Beyond individual rulings, Judge Porter’s ongoing involvement with the Federalist Society indicates a continued engagement with scholarly discussions about constitutional interpretation and the role of the judiciary. As president of the Pittsburgh chapter, he has likely contributed to local forums and debates, fostering dialogue among attorneys, judges, and law students.

Since his appointment, Porter has served as an active member of the Third Circuit for more than five years, contributing to the circuit’s workload and jurisprudential output. His service adds to the continuity and stability of the federal appellate system, ensuring that appeals are resolved with adherence to legal precedent and statutory guidance. While his tenure is still in progress, the combination of his professional experience, scholarly affiliations, and judicial decisions positions him as a significant participant in the development of federal law within the Third Circuit.

Overall, David James Porter’s career reflects a trajectory from private practice and clerkship through active participation in legal societies to a role on one of the nation’s intermediate appellate courts. His appointment by President Trump, confirmation amid partisan debate, and subsequent judicial work illustrate both the political dimensions of federal nominations and the enduring responsibilities of an Article III judge. As he continues to adjudicate cases and author opinions, his contributions will shape the legal landscape for the states within the Third Circuit’s jurisdiction.

Sources & provenance

Every quantitative or attributable claim above carries a per-section [N] marker that resolves to the corresponding URL below. Each entry records the upstream provider, the canonical URL, and the timestamp at which the underlying source was retrieved.

Explore the federal judiciary

The U.S. Courts of Appeals are the intermediate appellate courts of the federal judiciary — thirteen circuits sitting between the district courts and the Supreme Court. Browse the full roster of judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, or explore how the appointed federal judiciary fits into the federal government.