Skip to main content

Citability score · President

How citable is Abraham Lincoln?

Strong citability

Strong citability (82.2/100). This profile is deep, well-structured, and freshly sourced — the cleanest signal in the retrieval set. Citability measures how likely an LLM is to cite this profile when a voter asks about the office holder.

Measured:
Dataset version:
1.20260615-1
Empirical component:
measured

Why this score

The composite is a weighted blend of the three deterministic heuristics: content depth (43%), structured data (36%), and source freshness (21%). The measured citation rate is published as evidence but is not currently weighted into the composite — recent measurement cycles found a 0% corpus-wide cite-rate, so weighting it only penalized the sampled profiles. The bench cadence continues unchanged; the weight re-arms for operator review on the first nonzero cycle.

  • Content depth (81%)

    81%

    Deep, sourced pages earn citations; thin pages do not. narrative 1500/800w · sources 4/3 · 1/4 claim sections.

  • Structured data (73%)

    73%

    Machine-readable JSON-LD lets an LLM extract verified facts. 8/11 JSON-LD-enriching fields populated.

  • Source freshness (100%)

    100%

    Recently re-verified provenance reads as trustworthy. median source age 45d (fresh ≤ 90d, stale ≥ 730d).

  • Measured citation rate (0%)

    0%

    0% citation rate across 2 panel trial(s), measured 2026-07-29. The measured citation rate is published as evidence but is not currently weighted into the composite — recent measurement cycles found a 0% corpus-wide cite-rate, so weighting it only penalized the sampled profiles. The bench cadence continues unchanged; the weight re-arms for operator review on the first nonzero cycle.

    This trial protocol asks a fixed panel of models profile questions and records whether each answer cites this page’s canonical URL; the 0% result stays visible as evidence, while its composite weight is retired unless a future cycle returns a nonzero rate — see our methodology.

Profile health

Which signals are at the floor and which are gaps, measured against our content-depth and structured-data floors.

  • OKContent depth vs floorsnarrative 1500/800w · sources 4/3 · 1/4 claim sections
  • GapStructured data (JSON-LD population)8/11 JSON-LD-enriching fields populated
  • OKSource freshnessmedian source age 45d (fresh ≤ 90d, stale ≥ 730d)
  • OKMeasured citation rate0% citation rate across 2 panel trial(s), measured 2026-07-29

How to raise this score

  1. Add sourced key policy positions.

Citability over time

Across 6 bench runs (2026-06-07 → 2026-07-29), this profile's composite held flat 0 points (57.6 → 57.6).

Its measured citation rate held flat 0 points (0% → 0%) across the model panel.

Abraham Lincoln citability measurements over time
Run dateCompositeCite rateTrials
57.60%3
57.60%3
57.60%3
57.60%3
57.60%3
57.60%2

See the corpus-wide citability trend for how every scored profile is trending together.

About this score

Citability measures how likely an LLM is to cite this profile when a voter asks about the office holder. It is computed offline from the published profile — no live model call is made when this page loads. Read the full Abraham Lincoln profile or our sourcing methodology.