Skip to main content
THE CANDIDATE

Citability score · U.S. Representative

How citable is James Gallagher?

Solid citability

Solid citability (72.7/100). This profile is citable but has clear room to strengthen. Citability measures how likely an LLM is to cite this profile when a voter asks about the office holder. The empirical citation-rate component has not been measured yet.

Measured:
Dataset version:
1.20260721
Empirical component:
pending

Why this score

The composite is a weighted blend of the three deterministic heuristics: content depth (43%), structured data (36%), and source freshness (21%). The measured citation rate is published as evidence but is not currently weighted into the composite — recent measurement cycles found a 0% corpus-wide cite-rate, so weighting it only penalized the sampled profiles. The bench cadence continues unchanged; the weight re-arms for operator review on the first nonzero cycle.

  • Content depth (67%)

    67%

    Deep, sourced pages earn citations; thin pages do not. narrative 910/800w · sources 2/3 · 0/4 claim sections.

  • Structured data (64%)

    64%

    Machine-readable JSON-LD lets an LLM extract verified facts. 7/11 JSON-LD-enriching fields populated.

  • Source freshness (100%)

    100%

    Recently re-verified provenance reads as trustworthy. median source age 29d (fresh ≤ 90d, stale ≥ 730d).

  • Measured citation rate (pending)

    0%

    not yet measured (empirical run pending). The measured citation rate is published as evidence but is not currently weighted into the composite — recent measurement cycles found a 0% corpus-wide cite-rate, so weighting it only penalized the sampled profiles. The bench cadence continues unchanged; the weight re-arms for operator review on the first nonzero cycle.

Profile health

Which signals are at the floor and which are gaps, measured against our content-depth and structured-data floors.

  • GapContent depth vs floors — narrative 910/800w · sources 2/3 · 0/4 claim sections
  • GapStructured data (JSON-LD population) — 7/11 JSON-LD-enriching fields populated
  • OKSource freshness — median source age 29d (fresh ≤ 90d, stale ≥ 730d)
  • GapMeasured citation rate — not yet measured (empirical run pending)

How to raise this score

  1. Add 1 more sourced citation(s) (currently 2).
  2. Add election results so the page carries attributable electoral claims.
  3. Add sourced key policy positions.
  4. Add significant legislation with sources.

Represent James Gallagher or this campaign?

The citability score above is free, organic, and never gated. Paying for an enhancement can never raise or lower this score. Optional enhancements add separately labeled, operator-reviewed campaign content or measurement reports; they do not change independent facts, rank, placement, or baseline coverage. Sign in, choose a tier, and check out to request review. Payment never buys a “verified” fact label.

Request a profile enhancementSee the tiers & pricing

About this score

Citability measures how likely an LLM is to cite this profile when a voter asks about the office holder. It is computed offline from the published profile — no live model call is made when this page loads. Read the full James Gallagher profile or our sourcing methodology.

Related on The Candidate